Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta reseñas. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta reseñas. Mostrar todas las entradas

martes, 17 de mayo de 2016

In praise of William Shakespeare

Hoy colgamos aquí la prueba indeleble de que nuestro flamante profesor de inglés Nick Van Deneynde was here.

Y lo hace con un maravillosos ensayo a lo Italo Calvino sobre las razones de seguir trayendo a William Shakespeare a las escuelas. Y en la lengua del aludido, que para eso estamos.


To read or not to read Shakespeare in the 21st century

In honour of 400 years of Shakespeare, it seems necessary to look back on the greatest poet of the English language. Or is he? Nowadays, fantastic writers pop up like flowers in spring. Also, is it still essential to read Shakespeare? After all, he has been dead for 400 years. Are his works still valuable to us? And if so, should they be taught in high school?

First of all, what are the reasons to read Shakespeare in the 21st century? Firstly, his characters are very layered. What does that mean? They have profound characters. They are not simple. For example, the bad guy will still show regret at what he’s done. Second, the storylines are amazing. Shakespeare was able to make very interesting stories. Thirdly, it is quite difficult to read Shakespeare. So, if you’re up for the challenge, it is worth the effort. The fourth reason is the historical element in his works. He perfectly describes the Elizabethan era (England’s Golden Age) and gives us an insight into the world Shakespeare lived in.

However, these reasons might also give food for thought to NOT read Shakespeare. These layered characters make the play far more difficult. Let’s look again at the villain who shows remorse. Here it is Claudius, Hamlet’s uncle who has taken the crown. While praying, Claudius shows his remorse at killing his own brother. Wouldn’t it be easier if Claudius was just a demonic bad guy and easy to hate? Shakespeare’s plays are not easy to read because the plot is often so layered as well. And if that isn’t enough, the language isn’t casual either. For example, when will you ever say to someone the phrase “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?”. I’m sorry, but no girl falls for that, boys.

The final question is then if Shakespeare should still be taught in high school? It requires a high level of English to read the authentic Shakespeare and kids aren’t likely to ever use it again. In my opinion, yes. We should still read Shakespeare in high school. Why? Because of his influence on contemporary literature. Shakespeare has made some of the most hated villains and well-loved protagonists in world literature. Furthermore, there are many abridged versions for lower-level learners. So yes, even first years can study Shakespeare. His works can teach students a profound insight into the English language and its history. Because, even though Shakespeare claims the opposite in A Midsummer Night’s Dream, you are never too old or too young to learn.

viernes, 19 de febrero de 2016

DE BIBLIOTECAS CIENTÍFICAS Y DESMANES ACTUALES


Este que veis aquí es el profesor Brian Greene, de la Universidad de Columbia:


Y nos gustaría inaugurar nuestra biblioteca científica recomendado su primer libro, El Universo Elegante, de 1999.


Y es que Einstein nunca se pasa de moda, ahora que los científicos ya han descubierto pruebas de la existencia de las ondas gravitacionales ya anunciadas en el modelo einsteniano.
Para leer el Universo Elegante de Greene, efectivamente, no hacen falta "conocimientos de matemáticas o de física" (ya le gustaría al escritor de esta entrada), sólo pura y dura curiosidad de Hombres (y nada de lo humano...). Es una manera extraordinaria de vislumbrar, aunque sea sólo superficialmente, los detalles de la teoría de la relatividad de Einstein y de la teoría cuántica de Planck. Greene nos explica a pie de calle las inmensas dificultades que los físicos teóricos tienen que superar para conjugar ambas teorías y el papel que la Teoría de Cuerdas y la multiplicidad de dimensiones juegan en ello.
Y todo ello, con unas razones que mi parte de filósofo no puede dejar de citar por trasladarme directamente a Platón (que tampoco se pasa de moda): que el modelo además de ser matemáticamente exacto también ha de ser estético, elegante, bello.   
Y después de su lectura entenderemos el por qué de uno de los más injustos desmanes del mundo actual:
  
   ¿Por qué el Dr. Sheldon Cooper abandona la Teoría de Cuerdas?